Lighttpd vs thttpd

by damonp on April 10, 2005

in SysAdmin

I manage a forums site that utitlizes RRDNS to load balance several webservers to a single db server. The site serves a lot of images, so to tweak performance even further I wanted to try to move the images off on to a lightning fast file-only server (no PHP on minimal file transfer services). Its amazing how much faster a small footprint server can be. An optimized Apache2 process with only PHP and a handful of other modules compiled in is still 6-8MB. Running 300 of those at a time is a hog.

After some searching, I came of with these potentials:

After a quick look at both packages, thttpd seems to be more lightweight, which is just what I am after. lighttpd is definitely more full featured, it even supports a dozen or so Apache-style modules like vhosts, httpd authentication, Ruby and even PHP. On this project I don’t see the need for the majority of these so hopefully thttpd will be my baby. I’m going to try it out first and see.

More later…

Popularity: 2%

Most Popular Posts

Damon Parker is a freelance sysadmin and web developer in Texas. He specializes in server setup, server security and high performance server configurations. Need help setting up a web server or getting a server back online after a crash or hack? Email Damon

Leave a Comment

{ 2 trackbacks }

Previous post:

Next post: