Dirt

How Much Censoring Does Google Do?

by damonp on July 11, 2007

in Random Thoughts

I was playing with a backlinks checker earlier and stumbled upon some interesting Yahoo and Google link love facts…

Yahoo doesn’t seem to hold a grudge against their rival Google (quickly becoming everyone’s rival). Yahoo lists plenty of backlinks in its search results for google.com. Google isn’t currently returning the favor for yahoo.com. In fact Yahoo shows more backlinks for Google than Google does for itself. Surely Google caps its results.

Try directly at Google with a search like this:
For Yahoo at Google
http://www.google.com/search?q=link:yahoo.com
0 Pages

For Google itself
http://www.google.com/search?q=link:google.com
1,600,000 Pages.

Or even going to Google’s advanced search page and using their Links search,

Links – Find pages that link to the page

http://www.google.com/advanced_search

Try both yahoo.com and google.com there.

Google’s backlinks are known to be only a small percentage of what are actually crawled, but 10% of ZERO is still ZERO. Given the round number 1,600,000, I’d say the results are capped.

Over at Yahoo, the results are quite different.

For Google at Yahoo
https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http%3A%2F%2Fgoogle.com
Currently 17,475,629 pages.

For Yahoo at Yahoo
https://siteexplorer.search.yahoo.com/search?p=http%3A%2F%2Fyahoo.com
Currently 1,675,687,898 pages. That’s 1.6 billion.

I have always defaulted to Google’s search. Originally because that was all they did. With the Yahoo Directory and all of Yahoo’s other offerings, I assumed years ago that since Google concentrated on search, their tool would be better. Now I’m wondering what I may be missing.

It is every business’ prerogative to do what works best for them. Internet search is becoming a utility though. Millions of people depend on their daily bread for traffic from these utilities. Is there anyone monitoring them?

Popularity: 1%

{ 3 comments }

Be Care When Changing Contact Email on a Domain at Godaddy.com

by damonp on January 15, 2007

in Uncategorized

I recently tried to transfer a block of domains out of Godaddy.com for a client. We had to update the email as the domain was registered, forgotten and the original email contact was given over to spammers. ICANN regulations say:

Upon denying a transfer request for any of the following reasons, the Registrar of Record must provide the Registered Name Holder and the potential Gaining Registrar with the reason for denial. The Registrar of Record may deny a transfer request only in the following specific instances:

1. Evidence of fraud
2. UDRP action
3. Court order by a court of competent jurisdiction
4. Reasonable dispute over the identity of the Registered Name Holder or Administrative Contact
5. No payment for previous registration period (including credit card charge-backs) if the domain name is past its expiration date or for previous or current registration periods if the domain name has not yet expired. In all such cases, however, the domain name must be put into “Registrar Hold” status by the Registrar of Record prior to the denial of transfer.
6. Express written objection to the transfer from the Transfer Contact. (e.g. – email, fax, paper document or other processes by which the Transfer Contact has expressly and voluntarily objected through opt-in means)
7. A domain name was already in “lock status” provided that the Registrar provides a readily accessible and reasonable means for the Registered Name Holder to remove the lock status.
8. A domain name is in the first 60 days of an initial registration period.
9. A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back to the original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or where a decision in the dispute resolution process so directs).

http://www.icann.org/transfers/policy-12jul04.htm

Godaddy.com goes this a few steps further and decides to put a 60 day hold for any change in registrant information (like the contact email). Its an obvious retention ploy, but they lean on security, saying someone may be trying to hijack the domain.

OK… it’s my domain, I’m on the phone with you, what information do you need me to verify to prove this isn’t a hijack attempt? Credit card I registered it with, the original purchase confirmation email (I save everything digital), what do you need?

Sorry, sir but that isn’t going to be possible. You agreed to our terms when you purchased the domain and they explicitly state that any changes to the registrant information will lock the domain for 60 days.

You got me there, the fine print I agreed to three years ago when I purchased. If this was really for my protection, important things like this would be reminded when making a change.

I browsed the site looking for this fine print and was not able to find it. Called back to ask for a link and the next rep gave me the same spiel until I read him the ICANN document. Wait… are you saying you only changed the email address? Usually we let that go as an ‘exception’.

Let me check some things. On hold for over thirty minutes because the ‘transfer concierge’ was really busy. The rep did pop back in a few times to apologize and be sure I was still holding. Thanks for speakerphone.

Finally, the hold has supposedly been lifted. I re-initiated the transfer and crossed my fingers.

Popularity: 1%

{ 0 comments }

Will Oracle Make a Play for Zend?

14 February 2006

Oracle recently bought out Sleepycat Software, the creators of the Berkley DB. Berkley DB is the most widely used open source database engine. Last October, Oracle acquired InnoDB another major database engine. The MySQL server application supports several different database engines. Two of these being Berkley DB and InnoDB. MySQL was also recently working with [...]

Read the full article →

Google Tracks Users Web Searches

24 January 2006

I hate the fact that while I am logged in to my Adwords/Adsense account and I do a Google search from the same browser (different tab or window) that my searches show that I am logged in to Google too. What about all of the times I forget to explicitly logout of a Google property? [...]

Read the full article →

Are You Competing With Google’s Own Employees For Adwords?

9 September 2005

Many SEO boards went ballistic this week after a post by a Google employee let it be known that not only does Google allow it’s employees to have and use real Adwords accounts, but that they even encourage it. Of course their own employees don’t get rich with their inside information – ‘but not to [...]

Read the full article →

What is Google Doing With Our Information?

19 August 2005

Google’s internet search lets users find anything on the web quickly and easily. With a simple cookie, they can track everything you have ever searched for, let alone what they can do if you use the Google Toolbar. Google’s GMail, reads your email and places content sensitive ads next to your email content. Google Desktop [...]

Read the full article →

More Wal-Mart Music

18 August 2005

In my burning books post, I linked to an article discussing Wal-Mart’s attempts at censure of the American mind – how they pick and choose the CDs and DVDs and books and magazines the big box store serves up. This morning, I found another Wal-Mart music related post that claims they account for about a [...]

Read the full article →

Does Wal-Mart Burn Books?

17 August 2005

In The Wal-Mart Thought Police Amy Schiller discusses attempts by Wal-Mart to censor what we hear and read. Take, for example, Wal-Mart’s refusal to sell Sheryl Crow’s self-titled album in 1996, citing objections to a lyric that criticized Wal-Mart for selling handguns (a practice that the chain has since discontinued), which they felt was “unfair [...]

Read the full article →

Amazon.com and the Little Man

15 August 2005

Via AlterNet: Hold the Applause for Amazon.com The “revolutionary” company lost billions of dollars — an average of $376 million annually during its first eight years — yet it kept enticing speculators to pump more money into the company’s stock. Amazon’s speculation-fueled growth contributed to the net loss of more than 2,000 independent book and [...]

Read the full article →

Wal-Mart Movie

9 August 2005

WAL-MART: The High Cost of Low Price WAL-MART: The High Cost of Low Price takes the viewer on a deeply personal journey into the everyday lives of families struggling to fight goliath. From a family business owner in the Midwest to a preacher in California, from workers in Florida to a poet in Mexico, dozens [...]

Read the full article →